Google Proxies

[SamsungWhite]

Hi,

Something is wrong with the software, i am using NoHandsproxie to get google proxies for scrapebox but i cant get more than 10 proxies proxies after 1 hour of running... (same issue with vps from solidseoproxies & my home computer)

http://www.fastswf.com/0xj5Yx4

[tops]

why i do not see my last message?
ps. i have the same problem Please solve a problem with software.

[jimbobo2779]

All new users initial posts are moderated to prevent spamming of the forum.

The current lack of Google proxies is entirely down to the sources and the fact that Google is blocking IPs much quicker now than it was just 6 months ago.

If you are aware of any sources that are giving you that many Google passed proxies from SB in that time I would be very interested to take a look at them. I did a test with the built in SB sources last night and after more than an hour did not have a single usable proxy.

I have tested with all other tools and in my experience they are not able to find close to the number of proxies that NHP is, especially SB with its relatively few sources and much higher number of users.

[tops]

with scapebox (about 100 connections i7 16GB ram, ssd) i can find easly 20-60 google proxies in 15-30 minutes. I did it about 20 times last 3 days... with nhp i only have 2-4 google proxy
Second thing - with scrapebox i can use easly 100 connections on my powerful laptop, when i test nhp software say "20-25 connection" max... lol

Please solve a problem with software - google proxies is most importand for customers...

[jimbobo2779]

What sources are you using in SB?

[tops]

default

[jimbobo2779]

I find it strange that in here you mention getting 20-60 G proxies in 15-30mins with 100 connections when via email you mention 10-20 in an hour with 140 connections.

I just tested with 50 and 100 threads in SB and within an hour was able to get 2 and 9 proxies respectively with the default sources. This is what I have seen every time I have used the SB proxy harvester recently and is definitely what I am hearing from other users about this.

One thing that is very important to note is that No Hands Proxies is not just harvesting from a set list of sources it will also find fresh sources everytime you load and periodically as part of the testing process to ensure the proxy source list is as fresh as possible.

Also the proxies from NHP are available while it is checking so you can have a constantly fresh list to use whereas with SB you can only use the list once it has finished checking which means by the time it has finished a lot of the earlier checked proxies will be unusable.

Another big difference is that when testing proxies NHP is re-checking to ensure earlier tested proxies are still working whereas SB will just check once unless you re-run the test process.

Also instead of just being a run once to get proxies and then run again when you may need them again you can leave NHP running 24/7 so you always have a fresh proxy list ready and waiting to use whenever you want. This is not something replicated by most other proxy harvesters.

Ultimately you can stop NHP from re-checking and make it only use built in sources (or your own sources) and it will work like SB except with the outputting of proxies as it goes and you will likely get a higher number of proxies output but ultimately you will not be getting more proxies you will just have a bigger list with a lot of unusable proxies mixed in with the usable proxies.